Peer review is obviously important for research work. Is it always good for innovative work or any pioneering work ? There are potentiality to invent something which is unknown and its misuse. But is it right to stop brain’s curious nature or innovative nature in the name of “Ethical Permission” and “Peer Review”?
If the intention of the work is good ,further research is welcome.
Another issue is ‘internal negotiation’.When peer review is done in return of money ,how much & how long the honesty will be continued is a question.
On the other hand the “Predatory journals” are also a problem.
Innovation is always different from the usual path. We should feel its potentiality from our heart . For this type of works I will suggest to write book if they don’t have chance to publish in standard journal.
I would expect any suggestion regarding this .